Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[foxy backport] Keep domain id if ROS_DOMAIN_ID is invalid. (#689) #694

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2020

Conversation

hidmic
Copy link
Contributor

@hidmic hidmic commented Jun 22, 2020

Including domain id tests (some coming from #668).

@hidmic hidmic requested a review from jacobperron June 22, 2020 23:28
@hidmic hidmic changed the base branch from master to foxy June 22, 2020 23:29
@hidmic
Copy link
Contributor Author

hidmic commented Jun 22, 2020

About a fraction of #668 coming in with this PR. That commit bundles a lot of tests. We can backport them all before this PR instead of bringing in only a fraction of it as it is done here. I don't have a strong opinion.

@jacobperron jacobperron changed the title Keep domain id if ROS_DOMAIN_ID is invalid. (#689) [foxy backport] Keep domain id if ROS_DOMAIN_ID is invalid. (#689) Jun 23, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jacobperron jacobperron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

I also don't feel strongly about backporting the remaining tests from #668

@hidmic hidmic force-pushed the hidmic/foxy/backport-689 branch from a5af9a2 to 7a29617 Compare June 25, 2020 15:23
Including domain id tests.

Signed-off-by: Michel Hidalgo <[email protected]>
@hidmic hidmic force-pushed the hidmic/foxy/backport-689 branch from 7a29617 to a5f9aad Compare June 25, 2020 16:14
@hidmic hidmic requested a review from jacobperron June 26, 2020 16:48
@hidmic hidmic merged commit 29f999a into foxy Jun 26, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the hidmic/foxy/backport-689 branch June 26, 2020 17:27
@ivanpauno
Copy link
Member

This change broke rcl_node_get_domain_id behavior as described in #689 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants